If you have a lump sum that you wish to invest, you have a choice. You can either invest it all at once, or you can invest it over time.
Dollar cost averaging is a strategy where you invest a set portion of your lump sum at regular intervals over a specified period.
For example, if you have $12,000 to invest, you might decide to invest $1,000 at the beginning of every month for the next year.
Dollar cost averaging is different than deciding to invest a set amount each month out of your paycheck or through a retirement plan like a 401(k) plan. Those strategies do not involve the investment of a lump sum of money over time.
You should consider dollar cost averaging if you are reluctant to invest your lump sum because:
The truth is no one knows how the stock market will perform in the short term and it’s impossible to perfectly time the market.
What is clear, however, is that over the long term, the stock market will rise. The graphic below shows the steady rise of the stock market, as represented by the S&P 500 Index, from 1936 through 2023.
US Stock Market as represented by the S&P 500 Index. Growth is shown on a logarithmic scale to more clearly highlight growth through history. Data Source: Morningstar
As the graphic below shows, there are certainly periods along the way where the market declines—sometimes quite dramatically.
Source: JP Morgan Asset Management Guide to the Markets, U.S. 1Q 2024
But the important thing for long term investors is to put your money to work and take advantage of this historical upward trend of the stock market.
Dollar cost averaging can help you get started putting your money to work in the stock market.
It does so in a number of ways:
In all, dollar cost averaging can help you move forward with your investment plans, it may reduce the anxiety associated with doing so, and it has the potential to reduce overall portfolio volatility.
Here is an example of how dollar cost averaging works. In this example, the investor invests $6,000 on a monthly basis over a period of six months.
| Time | Amount Invested | Share Price | Shares Purchased |
| Month 1 | $1,000 | $5 | 200 |
| Month 2 | $1,000 | $4 | 250 |
| Month 3 | $1,000 | $2 | 500 |
| Month 4 | $1,000 | $4 | 250 |
| Month 5 | $1,000 | $8 | 125 |
| Month 6 | $1,000 | $10 | 100 |
| Total Invested: $6,000 | Average Cost: $4.21 | Total Shares: 1,425 |
Because the market declined significantly after the initial investment and then rose significantly over the six-month investment period, this investor ended up with a relatively favorable outcome.
The share price was $5 at the time of the initial investment, but because the market subsequently declined, the investor’s average share price was only $4.21. Because the market later rose significantly, the original $6,000 investment is now worth $14,250.
If the investor had invested the entire $6,000 in Month 1, they would have had 1,200 shares worth only $12,000—a nice gain, but with dollar cost averaging the result was even better.
However, this favorable outcome is highly dependent on the return pattern used in the example. Here’s another example where the outcome is very different:
| Time | Amount Invested | Share Price | Shares Purchased |
| Month 1 | $1,000 | $5 | 200 |
| Month 2 | $1,000 | $6 | 166.67 |
| Month 3 | $1,000 | $8 | 125 |
| Month 4 | $1,000 | $7 | 142.86 |
| Month 5 | $1,000 | $6 | 166.67 |
| Month 6 | $1,000 | $5 | 200 |
| Total Invested: $6,000 | Average Cost: $5.99 | Total Shares: 1,001.20 |
In this example, the market rose initially and then declined to the original price of $5 per share. The investor who used a dollar cost averaging strategy ended up with an average share price of $5.99 and 1,001.20 total shares worth $5,006. The lump sum investor paid $5 per share and ended up with 1,200 shares worth $6,000. The lump sum investor is better off in this scenario.
The number of scenarios you could imagine are endless and the results of each one would be different. In a hypothetical world where market declines and increases are perfectly random, dollar cost averaging could produce as many favorable results as lump sum investing.
However, market movements are not random. The stock market tends to rise more often than it declines. It depends on the period you look at, but over the long term the stock market rises:
In a world where the market tends to rise more than it declines, lump sum investing is likely to produce better returns over time than dollar cost averaging. The odds of upward market movement are simply greater, which favors the lump sum investor. However, there is more to the story in reality.
If the odds favor the lump sum investor in terms of performance, why would anyone consider dollar cost averaging? There are several compelling reasons:
The benefits of dollar cost averaging are primarily behavioral, rather than returns based. But overcoming behavioral obstacles is important in the success of a long-term investment program.
If you consider dollar cost averaging, check the impact of transaction costs on that decision. In some cases, periodic investing may result in higher transaction costs than lump sum investing.
The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a solicitation. This article is for dissemination of general information only. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date, but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. Investments are not guaranteed and are subject to investment risk, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.